🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared fresh requests had been made by go-betweens to restart talks with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Course

Araghchi is treading a difficult path since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a stance of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged stronger militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Talks Suddenly Ended

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that culminated with the American leader claiming the locations had been eliminated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their right to reimpose international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the discussions that American atomic experts could work within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Representatives asserted on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Present Position

Iran's diplomats declared the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be revived in certain ways if negotiations restart.

The American leader in recent days claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet receiving clear proposals from America either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran asserts diplomacy is not part of a show.

Political Stance

In his address to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a dominant force that exploits the notion of global regulations, Araghchi said the fortnight-long engagement revealed the conflict could not be ended by combat operations. He asserted the strikes began with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with complete American awareness and cooperation, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Stays the Final Solution

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the European states that had always attempted to impose their will during the talks. Diplomacy can still be viable and remains the final answer to address conflicts, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be followed."

"If they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and honor, they will get a reply in the identical tone."

Repair and Recovery

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, remains in place. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have grown stronger, more integrated, and more supportive of the administration and the state in the wake of this assault."