🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots added after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where election day went kind of poorly for him, where the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously backed the progressive this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he does so then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. So there was a little resistance. However no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.