🔗 Share this article

The Life Cycle of a Cult tends to be characterized by clear stages.

1. The Grand Vision

A charismatic leader or figureheads propose a new and transcendent idea pledging a cure for struggling players.

And so it goes. Plans are in motion to storm the compound in Australia. The gunships are circling. Conflict emerges from the out-houses. One individual, vulnerable, shivering, the words HIGH RELEASE POINT displayed prominently as a statement, has come staggering from the field and is removed under a blanket to a different team in county cricket.

Remember the early days, when optimism reigned? The days of Bazball 1.0, of uninhibited aggression.

2. Initial Adoration

Team architects offer a reboot, a brighter tomorrow, love, salvation among a group united in belief in the big idea.

How did it feel at first? A team united enjoying success. Body art. Muscles. Determination. Confident masculinity. Admittedly, The squad will claim it’s not a real term, amusingly since it’s not recognized, what did we see?

But we know what it is. It’s the player playing a shot so unconventional it’s beyond belief. It’s the excitement of Ben Stokes at his peak, an expression conveying: thoughtful warrior, strong features, natural look, truly contemporary you wouldn’t be surprised to glance over and see him playing at mid-off stripped to the waist embracing nature.

It’s the opener often seen speaking publicly, appearing as a happy little woodland creature in a waistcoat, expressing thoughts like we’re breaking down traditions. And yes, the atmosphere, for quite a long time, was uplifting.

3. Expansion Period

Development stage. Togetherness strengthened through repetition of key phrases. These beliefs are often illogical as a loyalty check.

Am I alone? The backlash, the fury, the feeling of letdown post-defeat appears excessive, too much. England batted badly on the field, as history shows. They were dominated defensively in a short span when tactics failed, outplayed by Travis Head playing aggressively but smarter, adaptive to conditions, a man playing with a kind of light around him.

And now we have this the attacks, the frustration, the view of the sport as a kind of abomination. The opinion suggests that defeat must be total, they must be humbled, to be purged, flame-throwered, destroyed by the vengeful purity of the bowler’s action, the conventional tactics of the bowler, seen enjoying successes modestly similar to getting a nice new fishing rod. What will this do to them?

4. External Conflict

Challenges surface because of mistakes. Yet, mistakes are denied. It turns to anger towards critics.

The fact remains, a few days before from the second Test, we have now reached a delicious point of tension in the lifespan of this movement. Victory is possible in the next Test with bold tactics. Probably, failure may follow. Should they fail it appears we really might be entering the final stage.

Before that happens, there are two things to consider about this. More than two years ago, during the initial excitement, of optimism and energy, an piece was published labeling it a movement. Criticism followed, which proved the point because everyone knows the best way of proving lack of cult status is should followers send hundreds of furiously one-eyed messages objecting to the questioning of the beliefs.

What has happened recently is just as interesting. Criticism of the approach has turned into a movement. Online outrage is widespread, angry English pundits, shots of angry middle-aged travelling fans cheated out of three days of cricket, similar to people wanting fairness.

Conversely, we have the wider backdrop of Australia’s more nuanced deep-seated frustration towards the unconventional visitors, claiming, your cherished traditions and have honed as part of your identity from others, it’s not serious after all.

And this is the real point. All movements are similar. The approach was a phenomenon because cricket is a cult. Or at least, the sport in England is closed, a clique, an elite gathering, a restricted environment with a long history of tradition and mystery supporting it. It has long been a place where power and access are hoarded. It’s the imperial sport of the British, the pioneering brand. And notably, Britain is itself a cult, a structure of hidden ranks, a royal family remains.

The team have been isolated within this world since childhood. In trying to escape from it, to create a less brutal environment, they are just repeating their past, forming a new circle, a limited community, but doing it this time with a modern squad and a mentor promoting authenticity if you fit the mold.

Live where your feet are. Confront risks. Despite efforts, you’re always basically in the same place.

With this mind, it is perhaps the moment to show understanding for the approach, to acknowledge its merits, of which there are many. How to define it? Creating a sense of freedom. Questioning traditions. Batting aggressively|Attacking with